Sunni scholars claim that when the Messenger of God (PBUH) intended to consult his companions on a matter, he specifically sought the opinions of Abu Bakr and Umar, who would then provide their views. Consequently, Sunni scholars have taken this as evidence of the superiority and precedence of these two over other companions, deeming them more suitable for leadership. This paper aims to elucidate the baselessness of the Sunni arguments supporting such an exclusive claim, relying on documented narrations and historical reports. It seeks to answer the question: Did Abu Bakr and Umar hold such a position with the Prophet (PBUH)? In fact, this research employs a historical-analytical method and uses evidence to demonstrate that, firstly, the belief among Sunnis that the Prophet (PBUH) only consulted with the two Shaykhs lacks any authenticity; as the Prophet was known for consulting many individuals from various backgrounds, and this practice was not limited to any specific person or group. Secondly, the Messenger of God (PBUH) did not need to consult others, as he gained nothing from such consultations; this was an act of divine mercy for the community, rather than a necessity for his own understanding of people's opinions.