Throughout history, several hadiths narrated from weak sources or narrators accused of exaggration found their ways into Hadith resources for Shias, even the most reliable ones. This phenomenon led to some adverse consequences for Shias, such as flat denial of implicit religious teachings conveyed through hadiths and even questioning the veracity of some hadiths. One of the crucial responsibilties of hadith scholars is to contemplate on how to encounter with these hadiths and their narrators, specially the ones directly related to imamate doctorine. The present study attempts to revisit the intellectual and hadith heritage of three narrators accused of exaggration. They are Sahl Biz Zyad, Mohammad Bin Sanan Zaheri, Mohammad Bin Ali Abu Somaineh. The current study also adopts a comparative stance towards hadiths narrated by these narrators and hadiths that carry the same content but narrated from reliable sources. The current paper then seeks to show that these two groups of hadiths transfer the same content, and the reliability of former group remains intact
Hosseini, S. A. (2016). A Study on the Teachings of Three
Narrators about Imamate, the Signs of Their
Credulity and Their Alleged Exaggration. Emamat Pajouhi, 6(20), 85-132. doi: 10.22034/jep.2016.81079
MLA
Seyyid Alireza Hosseini. "A Study on the Teachings of Three
Narrators about Imamate, the Signs of Their
Credulity and Their Alleged Exaggration". Emamat Pajouhi, 6, 20, 2016, 85-132. doi: 10.22034/jep.2016.81079
HARVARD
Hosseini, S. A. (2016). 'A Study on the Teachings of Three
Narrators about Imamate, the Signs of Their
Credulity and Their Alleged Exaggration', Emamat Pajouhi, 6(20), pp. 85-132. doi: 10.22034/jep.2016.81079
VANCOUVER
Hosseini, S. A. A Study on the Teachings of Three
Narrators about Imamate, the Signs of Their
Credulity and Their Alleged Exaggration. Emamat Pajouhi, 2016; 6(20): 85-132. doi: 10.22034/jep.2016.81079